|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Shape of Folly by Eugene Marshall (@ArcanistPress)
“A Lost Dwarven Mine Reshaped by Malfunctioning Modrons! A four- to six-hour adventure for three to seven 1st to 4th level characters, with tips for higher level play With guidance to set it in the Sword Coast, Undermountain, or your own campaign 32 rooms of mind-bending encounters Three levels, each with beautiful, detailed custom maps”
This is a brilliant adventure using concepts and creature not so often seen in 5th edition, handled with flare and aplomb. A combination of so many great ideas, nice touches, wonderful writing and attention to detail to make something truly elevated and finely wrought.
Adventure Primer
“The Shape of Madness, a DM’s Guild adventure designed for three to seven 1st to 4th level characters, with guidance for parties of higher level.
Though this adventure could be set in a variety of locations as the DM may choose, the default setting for this adventure is the Savage Frontier of the north Sword Coast, ...
Rating: [5 of 5 Stars!] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
I've been trying to adapt the Ghostwalk setting to a 5e campaign I'm about to run and the Eidolon/Eidoloncer class always was a pain to adapt. This little supplement fixes that problem with some very creative and efficient tweaks, while streamlining the class to adapt it to the standards of crunch of 5e. I'm not gonna lie, it's a messy fix. It may not be pretty to look at, but the math seems to check out and, at first glance, the whole thing feels balanced.
I'm glad that the flavour of the Ghostwalker paths remained after the adaptation to a new edition, and the addition of the Eidoloncer as a path, as well as the limitation to the amount of features you can gain is more than welcome. The art is very evocative (dare I say, more evocative than some of the art present in the original edition of the Ghostwalk Campaign Setting).
Of special note are the appendixes dedicated to feats and spells. While the feats are few (in line, again, with the streamlined feel of...
Rating: [4 of 5 Stars!] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
