As someone who just played a campaign wit ha ton of feats allowed, I have a slight aversion to using this. 1st, the rulebook contains rules that allow a PC to gain a feat at EVERY ASI in ADDITION to the ASI. 2nd, nearly each feat is just "increase your score by 1 + gain proficiency. if you have proficiency already you can double your profieciency bonus for each roll for this skill." You essentially get 3 points every ASI AND potentially expertise in a skill? That feels like too much, especially for a book that says feats should be more than just adjusting points and increasing DCs by 1-2 points

Liked the idea of this, but upon initial glance I'm disappointed. The feats provided are not balanced at all for getting them AND an ASI during the appropriate levels. And what's more some are just outright copy pasted from Old UA. For example, the Clergyman Feat, which is word-for-word the UA Theologian Feat.

(For Comparison)
Theologian (UA)
Your extensive study of religion rewards you with the following benefits:
•Increase your Intelligence score by 1, to a maximum of 20.
•You gain proficiency in the Religion skill. If you are already proficient in the skill, you add double your proficiency bonus to checks you make with it.
•You learn the thaumaturgy and detect evil and good spells. You can cast detect evil and good once without expending a spell slot, and you regain the ability to do so when you finish a long rest.

If this feat is being contributed to your 28 "brand new feats" then I'm just disappointed. Hard pass.