Close
Close
Advanced Search

D&D 5e - Expanded Armory & Gear
Quick Preview
/gs_flipbook/flip.php?xml=/demo_xml/174973.xml&w=500&h=324
Full‑size Preview
https://watermark.dmsguild.com/pdf_previews/174973-sample.pdf

D&D 5e - Expanded Armory & Gear

ADD TO WISHLIST >
PDF
$
Suggested Price $0.50

A plethora of exotic weapons updated for 5e.  Additionally, I have included 4 new equipment packs.

Let me know what you think.

Check out Volume 2:  /product/179621/DD-5e--Expanded-Armory--Gear-Vol-2

Final Update:  Increased the strength requirements and costs for the more powerful weapons

 
 More from this Title's Contributors
 
 Customers Who Bought this Title also Purchased
Reviews (9)
Discussions (18)
Customer avatar
Scott S August 15, 2019 1:15 pm UTC
PURCHASER
I love the work you have done but something needs tweaking,

Your Falchion is just stupid heavy 8 lbs? Here is the information to an actual Falchion.

The Thorpe Falchion, a surviving example from England's 13th century, was just under 904 grams (1.99 lb) in weight. Of its 956 millimetres (37.6 inches) length, 803 millimetres (31.6 in) are the straight blade which bears a cusped or flare-clipped tip similar to the much later kilij of Turkey
Customer avatar
Frederik B April 27, 2019 1:39 pm UTC
Just looking at the sample right now.
This is breaking the intended Design.
There should be no 1-handed Heavy Weapon (because of the interactions with the Great Weapon Master Feat).
There should be no 2-handed Finesse Weapons (because of the interactions with Sneak Attack).

Yes there are kinda execptions to this (Valenar Double-Scimitat in Eberron for example) they are utterly more restricted.
If those properties where on special weapons and not simple/martial weapons, or would require a feat to unlock these superior behaviour you could mitigate some of the impact.

While I like your additions, I think this is overall too game breaking, at least for my games.
Customer avatar
Brian A July 02, 2019 6:20 am UTC
PURCHASER
Great Weapon Master with a one-handed weapon doesn't make sense from a thematic perspective, but I can also see how it may cause problems in some scenarios if used with a shield (especially if dual wielding since the feat just let's the weapons not be light).

However, I see no issues at all with Sneak Attack and a two-handed finesse weapon. Sneak Attack only requires that "you have advantage on the attack roll, the attack must use a finesse or a ranged weapon..." or that "You don't need advantage on the attack roll if another enemy of the target is within 5 feet of it, that enemy isn't incapacitated, and you don't have disadvantage on the attack roll."

Nothing here creates any issue with a two-handed weapon. None at all. Not in terms of mechanics, at least.

In terms of optimization, dual wielding allows you one extra chance to land your sneak attack with your off-hand in case you miss, so going two-handed would actually be less optimal in some cases, even...See more
Customer avatar
Ethan G November 02, 2018 4:46 pm UTC
PURCHASER
*reads damage and properties of katana*
Dear god I can hear the weeaboos now...
Customer avatar
Freyja B July 25, 2018 4:15 am UTC
PURCHASER
katana and bastard sword are way overpriced. source: me, a bladesmith who knows how these things work
Customer avatar
Andrew C June 13, 2018 4:58 am UTC
PURCHASER
Hello! Wondering if you have tested the extra Monk weapons with Xanathar's Guide to Everything and more specifically the Kensei subclass. Most of the Monk weapons such as the Tri-Section Staff or Kusari-Gama are disallowed from being Kensei weapons due to having the Special quality. Have you considered adding an exception or would that unbalance them too much?
Customer avatar
João Paulo H January 08, 2017 9:08 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Founded this and find it cool. But can't download the pdfs for god's sake! D:
Customer avatar
Andreas B December 09, 2016 6:14 pm UTC
PURCHASER
That work is really awesome! You really have helped a lot in my campaign!
I have one single question though:
What difference is there between a Scimitar and a Wakizashi, that could explain the 275gp gap?
Customer avatar
Josie J June 11, 2017 9:59 pm UTC
I'd guess rarity, depending on you campaign setting but I'm guessing that there's a lot of scimitars floating around while Wakizashi are more limited due to not being mass produced (or as much as mass production works in fantasy medieval settings).
Customer avatar
roderick K November 04, 2016 1:47 am UTC
PURCHASER
I think that some of the heavy weapons should not be heavy:

- bastard sword and o-katana for being Versatile.

- Falchion in comparison to greatclub.
Customer avatar
Jim B January 19, 2019 4:48 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Indeed, A falchion is greatly miss-represented often as a weapon, in real life they had extraordinarily thin blades(all the better to cut through gambeson with), and were thus fairly light swords. This is also why many surviving examples have holes rusted right through them.
Customer avatar
Dale K August 06, 2016 11:47 pm UTC
PURCHASER
OK, your thoughts on the Katana are not sound. Look up Miyamoto Musashi - Niten Ichi-Ryu its a dual wielding fighting style with using a Katana one handed. Length of a Katana does not make it two handed or the weight. Weight 1.1–1.3 kg / Blade length approx. 60–73 cm (23 5⁄8–28 3⁄4 in) This is smaller than a Long-sword....

I also have other issues with this list as they do not represent the real weapons in a reasonable way.
Customer avatar
May 16, 2016 12:27 am UTC
First off - thanks for doing this - weapons are an area sorely neglected in the current official game
two things with regards to the Jian
1) while i like the idea of being able to choose weapon damage type i feel it should potentially have different damage amounts with the different types perhaps otherwise it is strictly better than other one handed weapons in the dmg (so long as you dont ever plan on using them two handed i suppose)
2) 1d8 on a light weapon - regardless of damage type - makes this the new dual wielding sword and makes dual wielder feat essentially just a feat for +1 to AC - goes from a situational feat to a feat where there is always a better option - to make this at all balanced this needs to be an option only for +0/1 uncommon/rare magical swords/items
Customer avatar
April 30, 2016 10:27 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Hey, just wondering if im ok to use this in my campaign blog, along with other items you've uploaded provided i link back to the purchase page
Customer avatar
jason M May 03, 2016 12:34 am UTC
CREATOR
Most definitely!
Customer avatar
Selim G April 27, 2016 8:43 pm UTC
PURCHASER
All I can say is thank you so much for making something like this, I'm new to the system so I've no idea what to do to balance new weapons in the arsenal, and I'm super sorry that I haven't got any pocket change to contribute to a hard-working bloke like yourself. This is going to help me a ton though, I appreciate it. Have fun gaming!
Customer avatar
jason M May 03, 2016 12:35 am UTC
CREATOR
You are most welcome! I have a huge docment that I am about to release with about 100 new magic items.
Customer avatar
Kai S March 24, 2016 4:56 pm UTC
PURCHASER
I personally am not a fan of weapons with both the Finesse and Versatile properties, simply because high dexterity offers so many more useful things than high strength outside of weapon use. Being able to focus on high dex while also having weapons that do the same damage as versatile or two-handed strength weapons seems to be slightly over-powered to me.

Also, regarding long swords and bastard swords; this is presented entirely wrong, but this is partly DnDs own fault. What many people think of as bastard swords actually ARE long swords - a dedicated two-handed weapon that can be wielded one-handed if necessary, but is not meant to do so. What DnD presents as a long sword - a weapon that is mostly used one-handed, but can be wielded with both hands, is actually what you would call a bastard or one-and-a-half-hand sword in real life.
Customer avatar
Christian D March 21, 2016 4:15 am UTC
PURCHASER
While i personally like many of these weapons, i do however need to point out that many of these weapons are redundant. For instance, the O-katana does 1d12 if wielded with 2 hands or 1d10 with one hand, why not just use a bastard sword. The Bastard sword does the same damage, as well as 2 different types of damage, for 1/4 the cost. This is a similar issue with the Full blade and Nodachi, while yes the nodachi has reach for 1/4 the price i can get a full blade which does not impose any Disadvantage. I might suggest maybe instead of have such high prices for these weapons and odd restrictions, you could say for Bastard sword and up that you get disadvantage on Initiative checks, its not to bad a penalty for the caliber of weapon you get, while still making someone think twice about taking it. You could even be adventurous and say those 2d8 weapons instead do 3d4. On a critical it turns into 6d4 doing an average of 15 damage plus any modifiers. Also as far as the STR requirements, you can walk in Full Plate without...See more
Customer avatar
jason M March 21, 2016 5:30 am UTC
CREATOR
Thanks for your pointers. I might tinker around with some of your points in the near future. The Nodachi has reach with the extra damage over the Full Blade. Yeah, the disadvantage makes the Nodachi less attractive but you can hit from further away. So, there is that. And thanks for that ending comment!
Customer avatar
alexander H March 13, 2016 11:31 pm UTC
The katana strength requirement makes literally no sense. They weigh LESS than a longsword (which can be wielded just fine in one hand in D&D, and is doable with some effort and proper technique in real life). In fact, they weigh the same as a European medieval arming sword (aka. knightly sword), which is a strictly one-handed weapon.
Stating that the katana is too heavy for normal people to use in one hand shows that you really don't know much about these weapons. Plus, the 1d10 one-handed damage makes them a strictly superior weapon to use for anyone with the strength for it, which would be basically anyone that would consider choosing it. Overall, it's just a badly designed weapon.

Oh, and wrist-mounted crossbows, while cool, are absolutely worthless. They don't have much room to accelerate the bolt (draw length), which means that to be able to accelerate it to the point that you can hurt someone with even minor padding, the bow must have an incredible draw strength, which usually means...See more
Customer avatar
jason M March 14, 2016 7:24 am UTC
CREATOR
After checking out your comment, I will respond with these points.

1.) This katana is based on the 3.5 version of a katana in the Oriental Adventures sourcebook. Now, most likely, Wizards of the Coast based that version of the weapon on the o-katana, which is longer and heavier than what we constitute as a regular katana. I simply transferred the weight over from that weapon and then created the stats. I can change the name if it suits you to o-katana. However, I am simply following in the footsteps of WotC at this point. Yes, it doesn't reflect the what an actual katana functions like (although I do have a katana at home and it still is a pain to wield one-handed).

To address your other point. Yes, it is powerful to utilize if you have the strength to use it. However, there are a couple of examples in the current PHB that are completely unbalanced with no restriction whatsoever.

Why would anyone utilize a greataxe over a greatsword? The former has a lower damage...See more
Customer avatar
jason M March 14, 2016 3:25 pm UTC
CREATOR
I renamed the katana to the o-katana and placed the katana in the chart with longsword stats.
Customer avatar
alexander H March 14, 2016 5:54 pm UTC
I'm sorry, but that doesn't make it balanced in the slightest. A 1d10 one-handed weapon is strictly superior to any other one-handed melee weapon, and the only requirement is a high strength score.
It is strictly better for a strength-based sword&board fighter to use an o-katana compared to a longsword. In fact, it is better to one-hand an o-katana with the dueling fighting style than it is to two-hand a longsword with the great weapon fighting style.
Customer avatar
jason M March 14, 2016 6:47 pm UTC
CREATOR
I'm aware that it is better and I have already justified my reasons for doing so. It benefits a strength-based class. You don't have to utilize that weapon in your games. I have noted your concerns. However, the current system of weaponry in the Player's Handbook is already unbalanced. This weapon is for DM's that are slightly more forgiving than what you are. There is a place for the die hard and the casual. I know plenty of people that would use this in their campaigns and the player would still choose different one-handers due to stylistic choices. Hell, my brother chose a whip (instead of a longsword or warhammer) for his paladin when he was playing. Where is the sense in that? Weapon damage isn't everything in a game

I informed you of the change due to me correcting the historical inaccuracy of referring to the version of sword I had in the book earlier as a "katana" when it really is an o-katana.
Customer avatar
Luc C March 21, 2016 3:19 am UTC
Barbarian would preffer greataxes over greatsword for very very obvious reasons !
crits double damage die yes, so basically 4d6 is better then 2d12...
but when you count savae and brutal critical that only take a single die more... you end up with...
5d6 for the greatsword and 3d12 for the greataxe. you immediately see the difference ! the great axe was created for the barbarians and the half-orc race who both have a need for a high damage die instead of a bell curve like the greatsword. because their racial or feature adds only a single weapon die. and not doubling it like a crit does.

so yeah, half-orcs and barbarian preffers great axes to great swords.
Customer avatar
Christian D March 21, 2016 4:19 am UTC
PURCHASER
Well, unless you like the ideas of one of the smallest armories ever in D&D you will have to accept this as a good start like i do. And remember, which many people seem to utterly forget, as a DM you DO NOT have to add these, just like any content in the Books. As a DM i can say i don't want a certain archetype or class for any reason (Though it should be for a good reason.). Stop relying on the books to guide your path/game and use what this game originally required. Imagination. Or maybe house rule these weapons with your own ideas and applications. I know i am, for me it is a simple fix.
Customer avatar
jason M March 21, 2016 5:34 am UTC
CREATOR
That is a good point. However, stylistic choices still matter. Additionally, my point still stands about handaxes vs every other light weapon.
Customer avatar
jason M March 21, 2016 5:35 am UTC
CREATOR
And thanks once again Christian.
Customer avatar
Ben R March 12, 2016 7:42 am UTC
PURCHASER
Typos:
(Ammunition. Vou can use a weapon that has the...)
(...your proficiency bonus lo the attack roll.)

3/10
Customer avatar
jason M March 13, 2016 7:22 am UTC
CREATOR
Thanks. Will fix that.
See 16 more
Narrow Results
 Follow Your Favorites!
NotificationsSign in to get custom notifications of new products!











Product Information
Mithral seller
Community Content
Author(s)
Rules Edition(s)
Pages
3
Format
Original electronic
Scanned image
These products were created by scanning an original printed edition. Most older books are in scanned image format because original digital layout files never existed or were no longer available from the publisher.

For PDF download editions, each page has been run through Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software to attempt to decipher the printed text. The result of this OCR process is placed invisibly behind the picture of each scanned page, to allow for text searching. However, any text in a given book set on a graphical background or in handwritten fonts would most likely not be picked up by the OCR software, and is therefore not searchable. Also, a few larger books may be resampled to fit into the system, and may not have this searchable text background.

For printed books, we have performed high-resolution scans of an original hardcopy of the book. We essentially digitally re-master the book. Unfortunately, the resulting quality of these books is not as high. It's the problem of making a copy of a copy. The text is fine for reading, but illustration work starts to run dark, pixellating and/or losing shades of grey. Moiré patterns may develop in photos. We mark clearly which print titles come from scanned image books so that you can make an informed purchase decision about the quality of what you will receive.
Original electronic format
These ebooks were created from the original electronic layout files, and therefore are fully text searchable. Also, their file size tends to be smaller than scanned image books. Most newer books are in the original electronic format. Both download and print editions of such books should be high quality.
File Last Updated:
May 08, 2019
This title was added to our catalog on February 19, 2016.