Close
Close
Advanced Search

Swordmage, A True Arcane Half-Caster for 5eClick to magnify
Quick Preview
/gs_flipbook/flip.php?xml=/demo_xml/224413.xml&w=500&h=324
Full‑size Preview
https://watermark.dmsguild.com/pdf_previews/224413-sample.pdf

Swordmage, A True Arcane Half-Caster for 5e

ADD TO WISHLIST >
Suggested Price $0.00

We are formerly Geeks New England.  If you came here looking for their Swordmage, you've found it!

Spellsword.  Battlemage.  Magus.  There are a lot of different names to describe characters who wield martial weapons and arcane spells in tandem.  This class concept is a personal favorite of mine, and though 5e has a lot of options to bring players close to the concept (like the eldritch knight or bladesinger), neither is the true arcane half-caster that most people wish existed. 

My class, which I've named the Swordmage in honor of the 4e class, takes a few cues from that edition, including the strong weapon bond and the third level abilities that two of the archetypes receive.  But it's also something a bit new, and borrows some mechanics from Pathfinder's magus class.  While designing it I tried to keep it similar to the paladin, which many already feel is a fantastic example of a half-caster and a sort of divine sister class to what a swordmage would be.  But I also tried to make it different.  Instead of the ability to sense divine beings and undead, the swordmage can sense the presence of magic.  Instead of getting smite, the swordmage can infuse their weapon with arcane power for extended periods, and channel the strength of full-powered spells through weapon strikes.

The four subclasses presented are designed to reflect the ways I feel a weapon-bonding arcane fighter would choose to focus their abilities.

The battlemage is the heavy-armored battle wizard.  They are designed to take punishment and simultaneously dish it out with spell-and-swordplay, and can help their allies by making an enemy more inclined to attack them.

The eldritch archer can do many of the things that other swordmages can do but at a longer range.  Arcane Archer may be an official fighter subclass in Xanathar's Guide to Everything, but I find it to be a disappointing take on the idea of a magical archer.

The shieldbearer is inspired partially by various shield-wielding heroes in popular media.  Shieldbearers can bond to shields as well as standard weapons, allowing them to turn what is normally a purely defensive item into an offensive one.

The spellsword is more a lightly armored skirmisher, and focused on attacking enemies with arcanely-powered sword strikes.  They are better able to unload spells into a target with their weapon and can teleport short distances to take advantage of an opponent's openings.

Please, as I always ask, critique and comment.  It's taken a lot of time to design this class, with a lot of input and opinions from around the Internet.

This work is part of the collections of the Arcane Athenæum.  Check out our other works below.

The Artificer class

The Dragon Shaman class

The Ranger (Revised) class

The Sorcerer (Revised) class

The Barbarian: Path of the Wild Soul subclass

The Druid: New Druidic subclasses

The Monk: Way of the Mystic Force subclass

The Paladin: Oath of Freedom subclass

The Savage and the Striker: Dual Wielding subclasses

The Sorcerer: Frozen Heart and Phoenix Sorcery subclasses

The Warlock: Great Wyrm subclass

The Wizard: Blue Magic and Sangromancy subclasses

The Sharkfolk player race

The Treant player race

Crafting Magic Items: A Guide to Artifice

The Draconomicon for 5e

The Explorer's Guide to the Wilderness

Recent Changes:

Version 5.0 18Apr2021

Overall

  • A new subclass has been added!  The shieldbearer, inspired in part by characters such as Captain America and The Rising of the Shield Hero.  In theory, the shieldbearer plays as a semi offensive/semi-defensive front-line striker.  Compared to the battlemage, the shieldbearer is less focused on defending allies and acting as a protective tank.  Instead, it focuses on buffing its own defenses and utilizing a shield in unique ways.  The spells and features you get access to can also help turn an enemy's defenses into a benefit for yourself, and at higher levels you can use your bonded shield to cast wall-like spells (or, due to a fun accident in terminology, bypass some entirely).
  • Reworded a number of features to make their use and certain situations a bit more clear.
  • Created a new Optional Class Features section at the end of the main class description, and before the subclasses.  This is done to help keep the class as a whole in line with all other classes; if your DM doesn't want to use any of the optional features in Tasha's Cauldron of Anything, then by all rights I don't believe the swordmage should be able to use those kinds of features either.  Thus the new fighting styles they have access to are kept separated for that reason.
  • The battlemage and eldritch archer have had their subclass spells altered a bit, to better fit their intended combat/party roles and distinguish them from other subclasses.  
  • A few new spells have been added to the class' spell list, including spells from Tasha's.
Battlemage
  • In the War Mage feature, changed the line that prevented you from making a bonus action attack if you made a weapon attack in the same turn, to now only prevent the bonus action attack if you used a Spell Strike.  The reason for this is simple; the feature lets you make a weapon attack if you cast a spell with your action, but it is also meant to reward you for successfully concentrating on a spell while in the midst of battle.  Not letting you make weapon attacks and still gain the benefit would be pointless, since besides casting a spell there aren't many other things you can do with your action besides attack.  
Spellsword
  • Modified the Arcane Counter ability a bit; now you can use it immediately when an enemy attacks an ally, interrupting their attack and giving the enemy disadvantage on its attack against your friend.  This makes it a more reliable and defensive ability, not just offensive.  As part of this change, the feature was given an Int-mod limit so it cannot be used an unlimited number of times.
  • The Recursive Strike feature has been reworked a bit.  Rather than letting you Spell Strike with one attack (as normal) and then letting you make a bonus action attack only if that attack missed, now you can essentially take the normal Attack action (letting you, as a 7th level Swordmage, make two attacks) when you Spell Strike.  You can then apply the Spell Strike to ONE of any of these successful attacks.  Then, any other attacks you make with that action are just normal attacks.  This allows for a bit more freedom, and lets the subclass feel a bit more like the swingy-focused, magic-enhanced attacker that it is.  Note that you should declare whether you will release your Spell Strike after a successful hit before you move on to make another attack.  If you end up running out of attacks in that one action without releasing your Spell Strike, the magic will fade and the spell slot is lost. So if you have two attacks you can make, and you don't release the spell on the first hit, and then the second hit misses, you've missed your chance to use your Spell Strike.  If you had the ability to make another attack with another action, such as if you multi-classed into fighter and burn an Action Surge, you would have to spend a new spell slot to Spell Strike again.
  • The Enhanced Counter feature has been improved to allow you to attempt a Spell Strike with the reaction attack that you make when you use your Arcane Counter feature.  This change, along with the change to Recursive Strike, is meant to better balance this subclass against the other subclasses and establish it as the quintessential "good at Spell Strikes" subclass.

Version 4.1 27Aug2020

Overall

  • Shield proficiency has been added to the class's armor proficiency. After some thought, I reasoned that there's no reason why the class as a whole shouldn't be able to use shields; either you're going to be bonding with a weapon that doesn't allow for shield use anyway (bows, two-handed weapons), you'll be utilizing a combat or character concept that doesn't use one, or you'll use one but the class fantasy is maintained regardless (nothing wrong with a spellsword using a buckler and a rapier, for example; actually that's quite flavorful as an arcane swashbuckler).  As a result, Battlemage loses its particular shield proficiency.

Version 4.0 13Nov2019

Overall

  • Arcane Infusion has been reworked.  After years- wait a minute *checks calendar* yup; years of people bringing it up, we've moved the 10th level feature (which let you make your infusion an element besides force) to the base arcane infusion feature.  Now, your infusion is force as a base, but you can change it to any other damage type (except bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing) so long as you know a spell that can deal that damage type.  This represents you having the knowledge to wield that element.  Yes, this also makes Chromatic Orb a particularly good spell if you want to be able to change your infusion on the fly.  But it's not necessary; force is arguably the "strongest" damage type in the game already.
  • As a result of the above change, there is a new 10th level feature; when you successfully hit a target with your Spell Strike feature (regardless of whether or not they pass any hypothetical save), the next attack made against that target before the end of your next turn has advantage.  Help yourself or your allies hit better.
  • Arcane Infusion has also been changed to no longer vanish on your weapon leaving your hand; the infusion now remains unless the weapon has "been away from you" for longer than a minute, similar to how the Pact of the Blade Warlock's weapons work.
  • With inspiration from the new UA that was released on Nov 4, we've added a new fighting style.  Arcane Warrior allows you to pick two wizard cantrips, either giving you some utility, a magical ranged attack, or maybe something like booming blade or lightning lure.  This is actually a really cool and flavorful way to give half-casters cantrips that I like a lot; it's literally part of your fighting style.
  • Additionally, speaking of that UA, a note has been added opening up the option to pick from the expanded fighting styles and spell versatility enhancements for the Swordmage assuming your DM allows you to use that UA.  Naturally if you're party's bard isn't allowed to take their spell versatility, you can't either.
Battlemage
  • Hardened Mind has been changed to 1/2 your Intelligence modifier (rounded up) rather than full Intelligence.  Because you have natural proficiency with Con saves, full Intelligence mod had the potential to get exceptionally powerful.  Especially when the War Caster feat is considered which is a very common feat for any gish to take.  It also now specifies that you do get this bonus when making a concentration check to maintain your Arcane Aegis.

Version 3.4 23May2019

Overall

  • The class's starting equipment has been modified a bit again, granting either an additional extra martial weapon or two simple weapons. The reason for this change is combat balance; despite the class fantasy of having one bonded weapon which acts as the fulcrum of the swordmage's powers, realistically a player will want to have a fallback weapon just in case it is needed. Granted, due to the way the bonded weapon works, having your weapon removed from you is extremely unlikely, but this does offer some flexibility in what you want to bring to a battle if you can plan ahead of time.

Version 3.3 14May2019

Overall

  • The class’s saving throws have been changed from Dexterity and Intelligence to Constitution and Intelligence, as Constitution applies more broadly to all of the subclasses.  With Dexterity, Battlemage tended to find itself with a saving throw that wasn’t necessarily appropriate for it.  But all subclasses benefit from Constitution proficiency, and it works well for a martial fighter (which the Swordmage half-is).
  • The starting equipment has been altered to provide more options.  A Swordmage intending to be a ranged fighter could take some kind of ranged weapon, but RAW they were given no ammunition to use with it.  With this change, the class defaults to a longbow, the “intended” weapon for an eldritch archer, much in the same way Rangers default to longbows, but I would imagine any reasonable DM would let you swap for a crossbow or something if you’d prefer.
  • Animal Handling and Survival have both been removed from the class’s list of potential skills, as they weren’t quite appropriate for the class fantasy as an arcane fighter.
  • The Spell Strike feature has received a change to its wording.  It now specifies that spells which have an AoE only effect the target, and if your Intelligence is somehow too low to have a positive modifier, you get a minimum of 1 use of spell strike regardless.  No change otherwise.
  • The addition of a skill has been removed from the Multiclassing proficiencies, as only certain classes provided a skill when you multiclass into it (Bards, Rangers, and Rogues).  These three classes tend to be the ones with the most skills, and the ones which focus most on being skill-focused, which the Swordmage is not intended to be.  And so you do not gain any skill proficiencies when you multiclasss into Swordmage now.

Battlemage

  • War Mage has been altered.  Instead of being identical to the Eldritch Knight’s Improved War Magic feature, you can now make a weapon attack as a bonus action if you cast a spell as an action OR are concentrating on a spell, the channeled magic increasing your martial capabilities in a similar way to how War Magic wizards become harder to hit while they are concentrating.  Note that, for balance reasons, you cannot use this bonus action attack in the same turn that you make a weapon attack; so you can't use your action to Extra Attack and then bonus action strike, or to make a Spell Strike and then bonus action attack.  We'll revisit this if we find that it's overly limiting.

Version 3.2 18Apr2019

Overall

  • Magic Sense got changed last version, but that was actually not using the proper language for what we were hoping to accomplish with the feature.  It's been rebalanced a bit; with this change you can't sense magic items behind total cover, such as a doorway or a barrier.  But, you can sense objects hidden on a person, like in a pocket or hidden in an article of clothing.  And some other rules explaining what else can block the sense.  The intention is that you're using this to either get a quick sense at how many magic items a person may have on their person, or give a cursory glance over an item that you are looking at and gain some useful information about it (like, is it even magical in the first place).  The feature was not meant to give you a large radius of super-magic sense that would let you pick up whether there's an item in another floor of someone's home, for instance.

Version 3.1 14Apr2019

Overall

  • We've made some balance changes to the class as a whole, and altered the design intention of the subclass-specific bonus spells.
  • Magic Sense has been reworked.  Instead of being a free, double-ranged Detect Magic, magic sense now allows you to sense the presence of magic items within a 60 foot range.  If you do sense an item in this way, you can also tell what rarity the item is, from common all the way up to artifact.  This ties into the Swordmage's fluff of being an arcane martial class which bonds with and utilizes the magics held within weapons.  Your magic sense allows you to sense the presence of these weapons, and how powerful they are.
  • Arcane Infusion has been changed a bit as well, as far as its damage output goes.  Still lasts 10 minutes, but now instead of the damage being equal to the spell slot used (which resulted in a range of 1-5 damage) it is 1 + the spell slot used, up to a max of 4.  This results in infusion damage from 2-4.  This makes even lower-level slots more useful, as even using a 1st level slot gives you 2 extra damage on each hit instead of just one.  It caps at 4 damage instead of 5 because we found that 5 extra damage an attack, combined with spell strikes, got a bit too powerful for our tastes.  We may revisit that in the future, but for now this means using a 4th or 5th level slot gives you no benefit over using a 3rd level slot for infusion.  This does also mean you get to play with your higher level spell slots a bit more, rather than feeling like you need to spend your highest ones on infusion damage.
  • The class's spell list has been played with a bit.  Lost spells include comprehend languages and illusory script (which we felt were utility-based ritual spells that had less of a place with a martial-focused class like the Swordmage).  Spells like longstrider and far step were also removed from the spell list, as they were changed to be subclass-unique bonus spells.  A few other spells were added to the spell list, such as detect magic now that magic sense works differently.  Rather than listed every change, you can check out the spell list for yourself and see if a spell you had been using has been lost or not.
Battlemage
  • The bonus spells granted by this subclass have been changed.  Now, Battlemages learn protection from evil and good, warding bond, enemies abound, Otiluke's resilient sphere, and circle of power.  This mixture of spells better enhances the battlemage's role as a tank and protector of its allies.
Eldritch Archer
  • The bonus spells granted by this subclass have been changed.  Now, Eldritch Archers learn zephyr strike, cordon of arrows, wind wall, elemental bane, and swift quiver.  This mixture of spells better enhances the eldritch archer's role as a long-range archer and caster.  Zephyr Strike allows for great positioning, while wind wall is a spell which takes advantage of the subclass's phasing shot feature to allow them to attack behind a unique form of cover.
  • The subclass's capstone feature Eldritch Accuracy has been reworded, hopefully to make it a bit more clear how it works.  It's not a complicated feature; I just want to ensure no one will get confused about how much of a bonus you get to hit or can I have extra damage and the bonus to hit at the same time? (The answer is no, btw; it's one or the other).  Your Arcane Infusion feature can either deal extra damage OR grant a bonus to hit rolls made with your bonded weapon.  And both values are the same; for example, if you used a 2nd-level spell slot for your Arcane Infusion, the infusion's extra damage would be +3 OR you get a +3 bonus to hit; you choose when you apply the infusion and can swap between these two effects with another bonus action on your turn.
Spellsword
  • The bonus spells granted by this subclass have been changed.  Now, Spellswords learn longstrider, blur, haste, freedom of movement, and far step.  Each of these spells better enhances the spellsword's role as a quick skirmisher who likes to dart in and out of combat, deal damage, and move away again.  Do note that a spellsword can still learn zephyr strike from their class's spell list, which is also a fantastic spell for them, and combos really well with longstrider.

For a full changelog, click here.

pixel_trans.gif
 
 More from this Title's Contributors
pixel_trans.gif
 
 Customers Who Bought this Title also Purchased
pixel_trans.gif
pixel_trans.gif
Reviews (8)
Discussions (77)
Customer avatar
Caleb A January 27, 2023 5:31 am UTC
PURCHASER
I love this class but i really feel like being able to spellstrike with scorching ray is too strong, i havent done the math but it just feels like it works out to be stronger than what other classes can do at the same level especially if you happen to get a critical hit
Reply
Customer avatar
Pita S March 02, 2023 6:26 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Scorching Ray is very strong with Spell Strike, but not exceedingly so. Keep in mind that if you were to land a critical hit with Spell Strike, you only double the weapon damage dice, not the damage dice for Scorching Ray (since you didn't crit with scorching ray, which normally requires its own attack rolls)

Let me point out that a level 5 Swordmage (level 5 is the earliest level that you can know 2nd level spells, like Scorching Ray) that hits a Spell Strike with Scorching Ray does almost the same amount of damage, if not less, than a level 5 wizard who casts Fireball at a single target.

Swordmage: assumed greatsword for high damage and easy dice output. Hits Spell Strike: 2d6 (Greatsword) + 6d6 (Scorching Ray) + 5 (Strength, generous 20) = you're most likely to roll 33 damage.
Wizard: casts Fireball against one target. Target fails save: 8d6 (Fireball) = 28 damage. (This is literally the same damage value minus whatever the Swordmage's Strength modifier is)

Note...See more
Customer avatar
Ryan H June 25, 2022 10:09 am UTC
PURCHASER
Suggestion on Arcane Aegis: This power seems really weak compared to arcane counter. It takes your action, has limited uses, does no damage, and the opponent gets a save to completely resist the effect. If they make the save or die before they get to attack you just wasted a turn to give them disadvantage on attacks that don't target you. As a front line tank type character you will be the target of most attacks anyway. I would either make this a bonus action to use or make it part of hitting with a melee weapon attack or casting a spell.
Customer avatar
Troy S May 29, 2022 9:33 pm UTC
PURCHASER
A question, concerning Spell Strike: At 5th level or higher, does it take your entire action to use this feature, or would you be able to make a second attack using the Extra Attack feature?
Reply
Customer avatar
Pita S March 02, 2023 6:16 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Spell Strike is an Action. You would not benefit from Extra Attack because you're not taking the Attack action, you're taking the Spell Strike action.
Customer avatar
Tim R March 08, 2022 8:34 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Hi! First of all thank you for all the work you put into this. Seems really well balanced! I was looking into the new shieldbearer and wondered why it is so MAD? The shield requires strength to be prioritized for attack rolls, then Intelligence for class features, but still relying on dexterity for AC due to only light and medium armour. Leaving next to nothing for consitution on a melee character. Why not ease the MADness a little bit with heavy armour proficiency on a "tank" subclass? Honest question from someone hoping to build a shieldbearer using point buy :)
Customer avatar
Christopher P October 07, 2021 4:18 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Been a little while since I checked on a new version for this class, but was the art that had been present in earlier versions removed o.o?
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V October 07, 2021 4:55 pm UTC
CREATOR
It was. There was some grand confusion regarding legal things and the like, public domain and all. In the end, for simplicity and because I don't want to even accidentally steal art, I simply had to remove everything.
Customer avatar
Michael V July 24, 2021 8:31 am UTC
PURCHASER
Just came here to see if there was anything new. And I saw you got an award! Congratulations!!
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V July 29, 2021 4:31 pm UTC
CREATOR
Thank you! Yeah I hadn't bothered to add the medals until now. Not nearly as popular as a lot of stuff on the site but I appreciate every download.
Customer avatar
Arthur H July 16, 2021 7:27 am UTC
PURCHASER
Am I missing something, or is Arcane Infusion just a smidge underpowered? Not complaining, really, im just concerned that for the same spell slots in most situations you could be averaging the same or more damage with a spell like hunters mark, which the Ranger, one of this classes contemporaries as a half caster, would have access to at the same level. Paladin does not have a similar ability, but its smites would be the ability that would most need to be balanced against the Spell Strikes (the balance of which has been asked and answered in these comments already). I really am just curious what the intent is here and if i am missing a design philosophy that leads to this ability being outclassed by the hunters mark spell in general.
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V July 16, 2021 3:06 pm UTC
CREATOR
The main idea of Arcane Infusion is to give you a smaller bonus to damage over a longer period of time; the damage bonus you get applies to every attack you make while the weapon is infused, without requiring an additional spell slot. I've run a number of calculations over time which show, over the course of an adventuring day, a swordmage is doing about the same amount of damage as a paladin smiting.

Compared to hunter's mark, the really important difference is that Arcane Infusion doesn't require concentration, enabling you to use a myriad of other spells that a ranger would be locked out of if they decide to use hunter's mark. That alone I think justifies it being on average less powerful than hunter's mark, because you can easily combine it with other spells.
Customer avatar
Michael V November 18, 2020 6:28 am UTC
PURCHASER
Hey so with the release of Tasha's Cauldron of Everything. Do you think you'd be adding a few more fighting styles to the repertoire? Like Superior technique and Interception
Reply
Customer avatar
David D November 23, 2020 11:35 pm UTC
PURCHASER
I came to ask this too. Would love to see Blind Fighting as an option.
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V March 18, 2021 9:27 pm UTC
CREATOR
I'll be looking into this, yes.
Customer avatar
David P October 27, 2020 11:19 am UTC
PURCHASER
2 Questions, how Spell Strike interacts with:
- Counterspell
- Mobs with Limited Magic Immunity (can't be affected or detected by Spells of 6th level or lower)
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V March 18, 2021 9:36 pm UTC
CREATOR
You're still casting a spell when you infuse the weapon, so the spell can be countered when you attempt to perform the spell strike. That wouldn't stop the physical attack from going though (so you'd still make a weapon attack and still get potential damage off that attack), but it could stop the effects of the spell. Subject to normal rules for counterspell of course (need to be within range, visible, and the spell needs to have casting components that allow the counterspeller to perceive that the spell is being cast). In theory, a sorcerer/swordmage multiclass could subtle spell the spell so it can't be countered.

For the magic immunity question, same basic idea. Say you tried to spell strike fireball a rakshasa; you'd still be able to hit it with your weapon and do damage as normal, but the fireball damage would basically just fizzle and do nothing; it's still a spell and it's still cast at a particular level, so it wouldn't affect the rakshasa.

For the record as well, spell strikes...See more
Customer avatar
Jim S September 11, 2020 8:52 pm UTC
PURCHASER
A few small thoughts:
1. The capstone is terrible. At that level the characters will have weapons better than +1 anyway, and +1 on spell DCs is just not worth it. I don't have any good suggestions, but maybe some sort of nova ability (staff of magi style)?
2. The spell strike ability is very good, but why limit to Int mod per LR? The spell slots are already a resource limit (just like divine strike for a paladin). That second limit is not needed.
3. Fighting style - while I see why another style was created for cantrip option it seems unnecessary. Why not just give the class two cantrips for each of the different subclasses, and let the player pick a fighting style that matches their character concept?

Overall, very much like this class (especially comparing it to the problematic PF2e Magus playtest occurring at present), just being nick picky.

Thanks for your hard work.
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V September 16, 2020 5:08 pm UTC
CREATOR
Hey, thank you for your feedback!

I think you're missing that the capstone is a "free" bonus that stacks with all other bonuses. So if you have a +3 weapon, your bonded weapon effectively becomes a +4 weapon. If you have any effects or abilities improving your spell save DC, you get an extra +1 on top of that. +1 to hit/DCs is not a small thing in 5e's bounded accuracy, and since this literally has the potential to make the Swordmage stronger than any other class in that department, I think it's a reasonable capstone.

The reason is simply that Spell Strike carries a lot more potential for abuse than the Paladin's divine smite, which is just straight up damage. Spell Strike has that, PLUS any other riders/effects that the spell could carry, such as blindness, disadvantage on rolls, etc. etc. It's limited in that way for that reason.

The discussion of cantrips is never ending and no one is ever satisfied with any explanations given. lol The simple reason is;...See more
Reply
Customer avatar
Jim S September 18, 2020 9:17 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback.

You are absolutely right, I did miss the capstone ADDS an additional +1.

Thanks for the design explanation on both the cantrips and limitations on spell strike, makes perfect sense.

Have been comparing your design with the PF2e Magus in play, and the ease of your class makes for an excellent comparison.

Stay safe.
Customer avatar
John D September 08, 2020 8:15 pm UTC
I was wondering if you would ever add dual weapon fighting as a fighting style option?
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V September 16, 2020 5:09 pm UTC
CREATOR
Not overly likely, since this is supposed to be a class that focuses on having ONE weapon that they bond to, and that's it. Technically nothing is stopping someone from dual wielding with their bonded weapon and another weapon, but I don't believe the class fantasy should have dual weapon fighting as a style the class can build into; it's just anathema to the idea of a Swordmage. I've made some mild compromises by allowing for back-up weapons, but that's mostly just a gameplay thing to players aren't entirely screwed if something goes wrong.
Customer avatar
Michael V April 18, 2020 6:40 am UTC
PURCHASER
Hey so question with spell strike. If you use spellstrike with a spell that allows repeat saving throws like levitate, will each subsequent saving throw after the first have disadvantage?
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V May 08, 2020 10:28 pm UTC
CREATOR
No, the intention is that subsequent saving throws would not have disadvantage; only the initial one. Reason being that they are getting hit literally with/at the same time as the magical effect, so it results in making it more difficult to resist it.
Reply
Customer avatar
Michael V May 10, 2020 10:24 pm UTC
PURCHASER
ok thought so. Just wanted to be 100% sure
Customer avatar
Edward B March 07, 2020 11:33 pm UTC
PURCHASER
If I use spellstrike am i still able to use my extra attack?
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V March 19, 2020 6:33 pm UTC
CREATOR
No; Spellstrike requires an action, so you are using your action to Spellstrike, meaning you aren't using an action to attack (which is when Extra Attack comes into play).

That said, if you were to, say, multiclass into Fighter and get action surge, you COULD make a Spellstrike, then action surge to make an extra attack action if you wanted.
Customer avatar
Edward B March 06, 2020 8:45 am UTC
PURCHASER
Is a level 3 spell slot the highest I can expend for the arcane infusion?
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V March 19, 2020 6:37 pm UTC
CREATOR
You can still expend a higher level slot than 3, you just won't get any more damage than 4 per hit.

So if you expend a 3rd level slot, it'll do 4 damage per hit. 4th level slot, it'll do 4 damage per hit as well. 5th level slot, it'll also do 4 damage per hit.

Customer avatar
Suiko R February 09, 2020 9:23 pm UTC
PURCHASER
So, at 2nd level you can get the Protection Fighting Style, which requires a shield. But it isn't until you are 3rd level and choose to become a Battlemage that you get proficiency with shields. So, if you chose Protection, during one full level (from 2nd to 3rd) you either: a) have a feature that you can't use, since you don't have a shield equipped; or b) you can't cast spells, since wearing armor/shield without proficiency forbids you from doing so.

Oversight or intended?
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V February 25, 2020 5:31 pm UTC
CREATOR
It's neither intended nor an oversight, really. It's just a problem with the way half-caster martial-focused classes work. You get your fighting style at lvl 2, and your subclass at lvl 3, so there's an unfortunate gap where you get that kind of interaction.

I could change when you get the subclass, or when you get the fighting style, but doing either would throw off 5e's leveling balance and I don't want to do that. I could give the entire class shield proficiency, bu I don't think the eldritch archer or spellsword should have it.

My recommendation when I think someone else brought this up was; just let the player have the shield proficiency a level early so their build works. I mean, it's literally just lvl 2; they shouldn't be there longer than a couple sessions, and I don't think it breaks the game.
Customer avatar
Michael V December 28, 2019 8:57 am UTC
PURCHASER
Hey me again. I just want to say I love the newer update to the swordmage. It's nice to have a tenth level feature that actually feels impactful. Tho I still wonder what are you gonna do about the material components issue? I have an idea if you want to hear it. And no it's not reducing the cost or negating it all together. But rather just a level 1 ability that specifies that you do not need hands to use the components
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V January 02, 2020 10:31 pm UTC
CREATOR
I have been thinking about it a bit, and I came to a conclusion:

Nothing is preventing you from grabbing onto the material item in one hand with your free item interaction, casting the spell strike spell which then goes into your weapon in your other hand, and then just dropping the item back in your pocket/amulet around your neck/whatever, gripping the weapon with both hands (if needed), and attacking. 5e lets you freely move your hands like that. You could start your turn gripping your greatsword two handed, let go with one hand to open a door, walk up to someone still holding the sword one-handed, cast a bonus-action spell with your free hand, then grip the sword with both hands again and make an attack. That is completely legal and RAW. 2-handed weapons only have to be wielded 2-handed, no carried 2-handed.
Reply
Customer avatar
Michael V January 04, 2020 7:22 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Yeah that much is true but I'm more specifying sword/shield kind of things. Cause at that point you can't cast spells with material components if boths hands are filled
Reply
Customer avatar
Jeff V January 07, 2020 4:09 pm UTC
CREATOR
That's fair. I want to be careful about allowing for too much play here, because I don't necessarily want to allow a Swordmage to get access to certain things by accident with the way I phrase things. I particularly want to avoid giving them part of the Warcaster feat for free.

Just saying "you must have the material on your person, but don't need to be holding it" might work, if it's ONLY for the spell strike. It just starts to feel weird if you are sitting there with sword and shield in hand, cast a spell which requires the expenditure of, say, 100gp of diamond dust (or whatever), and it just vanishes from your pocket without you actually interacting with it.
Reply
Customer avatar
Michael V January 20, 2020 7:26 pm UTC
PURCHASER
Fair enough
See 16 more
Narrow Results
$ to $
 Follow Your Favorites!
NotificationsSign in to get custom notifications of new products!















Product Information
Silver seller
Community Content
Rules Edition(s)
Pages
10
Format
Original electronic Click for more information
Scanned image
These products were created by scanning an original printed edition. Most older books are in scanned image format because original digital layout files never existed or were no longer available from the publisher.

For PDF download editions, each page has been run through Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software to attempt to decipher the printed text. The result of this OCR process is placed invisibly behind the picture of each scanned page, to allow for text searching. However, any text in a given book set on a graphical background or in handwritten fonts would most likely not be picked up by the OCR software, and is therefore not searchable. Also, a few larger books may be resampled to fit into the system, and may not have this searchable text background.

For printed books, we have performed high-resolution scans of an original hardcopy of the book. We essentially digitally re-master the book. Unfortunately, the resulting quality of these books is not as high. It's the problem of making a copy of a copy. The text is fine for reading, but illustration work starts to run dark, pixellating and/or losing shades of grey. Moiré patterns may develop in photos. We mark clearly which print titles come from scanned image books so that you can make an informed purchase decision about the quality of what you will receive.
pixel_trans.gif
Original electronic format
These ebooks were created from the original electronic layout files, and therefore are fully text searchable. Also, their file size tends to be smaller than scanned image books. Most newer books are in the original electronic format. Both download and print editions of such books should be high quality.
File Last Updated:
April 18, 2021
This title was added to our catalog on October 19, 2017.